Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts
Science is becoming increasingly more interdisciplinary, giving rise to more diversity in the areas of expertise within research labs and groups. This also have brought changes to the role researchers in scientific works. As a consequence, multi-authored scientific papers have now became a norm for high quality research. Unfortunately, such a phenomenon induces bias to existing metrics employed...
متن کاملanalyzing patterns of classroom interaction in efl classrooms in iran
با به کار گیری روش گفتما ن شنا سی در تحقیق حا ضر گفتا ر میا ن آموزگا را ن و زبا ن آموزا ن در کلا سهای زبا ن انگلیسی در ایرا ن مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. ا هداف تحقیق عبا رت بودند از: الف) شنا سا ئی سا ختارهای ارتبا ط گفتا ری میا ن معلمین و زبا ن آموزا ن ب) بررسی تا ثیر نقش جنسیت دبیرا ن و زبا ن آموزان بر سا ختا رهای ارتبا ط گفتا ری میا ن آنها پ) مشخص کردن اینکه آ یا آموزگاران غا لب بر این ارتبا ط گف...
The Challenge of Editing Einstein's Scientific Manuscripts
Einstein’s research manuscripts provide important insights into his exceptional creativity. At the same time, they can present difficulties for a publication in the documentary edition of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (CPAE). The problems are illustrated by discussing how some important examples of Einstein’s research manuscripts have been included in previous volumes of the CPAE seri...
متن کاملWriting scientific manuscripts: most common mistakes
I have had the privilege of serving as editor-in-chief for 11 years of two scientific journals: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and the Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. I had the opportunity to read and correct thousands of manuscripts. This experience was greatly enriching, because reading a text professionally completely differs from the perspective of readers in gen...
متن کاملMistake index as a surrogate of quality in scientific manuscripts.
Siler et al. (1) argue that “editors and peer reviewers generally—but not always—make good decisions regarding the identification and promotion of quality in scientific manuscripts.” Here, we provide a new perspective on the ongoing discussion regarding the quality of peer review and editing processes and discuss how the effectiveness of editors and peer reviewers can be measured. As well, we u...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Informetrics
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1751-1577
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.003